Thank you Yaroslav. It makes sense and I thought that might be the case, however since the guide doesn't draw a clear line between running vSAN on a physical host vs. virtual appliance, it got confused.
One more question: provided I'll be using 2x iSCSI + 2x Sync/HB physical links between the two hypervisors, does it mean that I'll have 3x iSCSI targets, that is, 127.0.0.1, Remote_Target_IP#1 and Remote_Target_IP#2, configured with a "Failover only" MPIO policy where the active path is 127.0.0.1? Technically it makes sense, however never worked with an odd number of iSCSI targets.
Can you please confirm.
Thank you.
One more question: provided I'll be using 2x iSCSI + 2x Sync/HB physical links between the two hypervisors, does it mean that I'll have 3x iSCSI targets, that is, 127.0.0.1, Remote_Target_IP#1 and Remote_Target_IP#2, configured with a "Failover only" MPIO policy where the active path is 127.0.0.1? Technically it makes sense, however never worked with an odd number of iSCSI targets.
Can you please confirm.
Thank you.
Statistics: Posted by ezoltan — Tue Dec 31, 2024 10:47 am